Switzerland’s Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) has recommended NO Covid vaccination for Spring /Summer 2023. Their reasons are that nearly everyone in Switzerland has either been infected, or been vaccinated, and the the current version of the virus is mild. Even people who are in the high risk category are not advised to get the vaccine. That’s good, right?
Let’s unpick this a little.
First let’s look at in the light the revelation that the AstraZeneca vaccine was banned for use in Australia[1]Australia bans the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine. We also have the distressing story of the young British psychologist who died after receiving the vaccine, and whose death was initially declared as being from natural causes[2]Psychologist’s death due to AstraZeneca Covid vaccine reaction – inquest. The inquest ruled that the cause of death was “unintended complications of the vaccine”, after his wife had sued to have the cause of death changed.
Why had it even been necessary for her to sue? The doctor who had declared the cause of death should have done that in the first place[3]Why you can’t trust doctors any more. This was certainly not natural causes, which raises the darker question of how many others there are, and what is the impact on the statistics of these incorrectly recorded “natural deaths”. I have commented previously about how statistics have been manipulated((Lies, damn lies, and statistics)).
In the USA, the CDC is recommending that everyone get the vaccine[4]Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines Including Boosters. Even if you have previously been infected, for adults and children as young as six months. Now we know that Americans are different from Swiss, but they are not a different species. So either the CDC is right, or the FOPH is. I’m going with the FOPH on this one.
While it is compelling, all of this is circumstantial evidence that we are intentionally being kept in the dark.
It’s not the first time that has happened.
During the Second World War, FDR and Churchill devised a scheme for America to support Britain. Before Pearl Harbour, the American public were adamantly against getting involved in the war. It was not their problem. FDR was close friends with Winston Churchill and knew that it was everyone’s problem.
So the two of them devised the lend-lease programme, which effectively gave Britain the weapons they so desperately needed to defend themselves against invasion. FDR lied to the American public and congress about lend-lease[5]No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II.
Now, it looks as though we are being lied to again, but it does not appear that the motives have the same moral weight as those of FDR and Churchill.
References